Legal Opinion

State v. Mattingly

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1955No. 7361PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

This case, here by reason of transfer from the Supreme Court, 268 S.W.2d 868, is a quo warranto brought on the information of the Attorney General at the relation of certain taxpaying residents of the town of Exeter against certain other persons then functioning as aldermen of city.

On the 31st day of December, 1946, the County Court of Barry County incorporated Exeter, Missouri, as a city of the fourth class. Thereafter the city organized its government, held elections, selected its officers and proceeded to function as a body politic. On May 9, 1950, at a special election, a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lilly v. TobbeinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Dye v. School District No. 32Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Hamilton v. LinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Smith v. Pettis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Lambert v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Abeles v. WurdackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Chuning v. CalvertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Lodwick v. CotteyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. STATE EX INF. VOIGTS, ETC. v. City of Pleasant ValleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. First National Bank of Colorado Springs v. Mark IV Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API