Legal Opinion

Brown v. Sutton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1923No. 7 Div. 367PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is unlawful detainer, instituted, originally, in a justice’s court by appellant against appellees. Consequent upon general affirmative instruction in defendants’ favor, verdict and judgment were awarded defendants. The giving of that instruction and the refusal of a like character of instruction for plaintiff are the only errors assigned.

While the bill of exceptions carries the recital that it contains all of the evidence presented on the trial, from the body of the bill it affirmatively appears that that recital is untrue, a deed executed by plaintiff, very material to the issue,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. CrossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Jefferson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Montevallo Mining Co. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Malcomb v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Sisson v. PruittAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Peyton v. Apex Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API