Legal Opinion

Sisson v. Pruitt

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1938No. 7 Div. 381PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The suit was by a holder of a mortgage on crops grown during the year 1936 on lands belonging to Mrs. Poe. The plaintiff having recovered judgment in the court below, the defendants bring this appeal and present a record including a bill of exceptions signed by the Judge, which states in its conclusion that: “The foregoing constitutes all of the evidence offered at the trial.”

However, at the close of the court’s oral charge there appears the following:

“The following written charge has been requested at the instance of the defendants, which is a correct statement of the law and is to be taken…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Mobile Light R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Jefferson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Johnston Bros. Co. v. WashburnAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. City Cleaning Co. v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Parker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Dees v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Harris v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API