Legal Opinion

State Bank of Downs v. Moss

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 17, 1969No. 45,341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This is a consolidated appeal of the three cases which are shown in the caption of this opinion. Consolidation was by order of the trial court pursuant to Rules of the Supreme Court, Rule No. 13 (201 Kan. xxiv), all parties consenting that the issues of law and fact are the same in each case. The record which has been filed in this court and is now before us is State Bank of Downs v. David Moss, E. C. Riley and Bessie Riley, and what we hold and say concerning that case will be applicable as well to the other two cases, State Bank of Downs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Salt Lake City v. O'ConnorUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Wait v. Homestead Building Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ram Company, Inc. v. Estate of KobbemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  2. Turon State Bank v. BozarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. In Re the Bulk Sale of the Inventory, Furniture, Fixtures, Vehicles, & All Other Assets of Hart's Transfer & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  4. Peoples National Bank v. Purina Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  5. Ram Company, Inc. v. Estate of KobbemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API