Legal Opinion

Winkelman v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 18, 1991No. 6966 July Term, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

GAFNI, J.,

— In this case, plaintiff Michael Winkelman seeks uninsured motor*651ist benefits from the Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned-Claims Plan. Defendant maintains that Winkelman is ineligible to receive such benefits under section 1752(a) of Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law. For the following reasons, this court finds for defendant.

Section 1752(a) provides that a person is ineligible for benefits if he is an owner of a motor vehicle required to be registered under Chapter 13 of the Motor Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. section 1752(a)(3). Winkelman claims that the applicable provisions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kresge v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Riley v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API