Legal Opinion
Holder v. Ivanjack
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 15, 1999No. 98 C 2837PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants the individual police officers and the City of Chicago’s joint motion to dismiss Counts IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX of plaintiff Eric Holder’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, the court denies the individual police officers and the City of Chicago’s joint motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
The complaint alleges the following facts which, for the purposes of ruling on this motion, are taken as true. Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mejia v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Washington v. Robertson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Doe 20 v. Board of Education of the Community Unit School District No. 5District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2010
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. WhiteDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2009
- Kurd v. Republic of Turk.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.