Myrlie v. Hill

MISER, C.

This is an action against appellant, a physician, for damages alleged to have 'been caused by the negligence of his office assistant. The negligence charged is that this assistant instilled into respondent’s eye a liquid which partially destroyed the sight. The appeal is from the judgment entered on a jury verdict and from orders denying- defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

There is a radical difference between the narrative of the occurrence on which the action is based as told by respondent and her witnesses and…