Legal Opinion

Foland v. Italian Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Italian Savings Bank of the City of New York, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 15th day of March, 190Í, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Queens County Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, J.:

The action is to recover from the contract vendor of certain real. estate the amount paid upon the. purchase at the time the contract was made, together with the expense of examining the title. The plaintiff has had a verdict, and the defendant appeals. The plaintiff contends that the title was objectionable on account of a restriction to which the land was subject by reason of the provisions of early deeds, but the defendant insists that the failure to perform was not due to a claim of such restrictions because the vendee never raised the question. A question of fact was presented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schiffer v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Darrow v. CornellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. New York Telephone Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. Segal v. KulchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. New York Telephone Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. New York Telephone Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API