Bell v. Lee
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VINCENT KEITH BELL, Case No. 13-cv-05820-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS SAC; GRANTING 10 KEN LEE, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY; RE-SETTING 11 Defendants. PRETRIAL DATES 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 195, 205, 207, 208 13 14 Defendant City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) has moved to dismiss plaintiff 15 Vincent Bell’s second cause of action (
42 U.S.C. § 1983
– Monell Liability and Supervisory 16 Liability against the City and County of San Francisco) from…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.