Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southern Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 31, 1911No. 7993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Wilson, J., Abbeville, October term, 1910. Action by Enoch Smith against Southern Railway Company. Defendant appeals. Mr. Gary cites: Judgment should be reduced: 81.S.

Read the full summary

Before Wilson, J., Abbeville, October term, 1910. Action by Enoch Smith against Southern Railway Company. Defendant appeals. Mr. Gary cites: Judgment should be reduced: 81.S. C. 387. cite: Carrier is only liable for loss or damage occurring on its own line: 19 S. C. 353; 36 S. C. 110; 43 S, C. 461; 78 S. C. 42; 85 S. C. 381; 78 S. C. 42; 75 S. C. 321. When penalty attaches: 78 S. C. 42; 79 S. C. 250. Recitals in B-L are not binding on this defendant: 25 S. C. 249; 78 S. C. 42; 196 U. S. 194. cites: Parol evidence on collateral matter is admissible: 59 S. C. 467; 48 S. C. 95. Terminal carrier…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice; Hydrick.

On January 28, 1909, M. A. Buffer shipped a carload of hogs from Morrison, Tenn., to plaintiff at Columbia, S. C. The car passed over the lines of four connecting carriers, — defendant being the last. The receiving carrier, the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. 'Louis Railway, issued a bill of lading, receipting for 157 hogs. When the car arrived1 at destination it contained only 127 hogs. Plaintiff filed a claim with defendant for $150.00, for the loss of 30 hogs at $5.00 each, the value stipulated in the bill of lading, in case of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Venning v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Thomas v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Elrod v. CochranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Bradley v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Reynolds v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tipton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. FlournoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Bank v. Hines, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  4. State v. FoxworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Gleason v. Bamberg E. & W. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API