Legal Opinion

Gault v. Kane

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1915No. 3693PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Major County; Action by C. E. Gault against P. S. Kane. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

On December 31, 1908, the defendant in error, Kane, executed and delivered to one Henry J. Martens, payable to said Martens or order, two promissory notes, one for $400, a second for $440, each of which notes were due and payable December 31, 1909. These notes- were, in the month of January, following, together with a large number of other notes, aggregating in amount $34,031, hypothecated with the Bank of Topeka, Topeka, Kan., as security for a loan at the time made by said bank to Martens in the sum of $16,000. • The Martens note to the bank not having been paid, suit was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. First National Bank v. McCulloughOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hadden v. RodkeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Young v. HembreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Messman v. WiltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. White v. City Nat. Bank of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Douglass v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Tom-Pah-Pe v. RoddySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API