Legal Opinion · Dissent

Senator Cab Co. v. Rothberg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1945No. 257Published

1DissentHood, Associate Judge

I dissent because in my opinion the majority decision is the result of an unauthorized invasion of the fact-finding power of the trial court.

Proof of appellee’s ownership of the automobile constituted prima facie evidence that Day was operating the automobile at the time of the collision with the consent of appellee. This prima facie evidence, or statutory presumption as it was termed in Rosenberg v. Murray, 73 App.D.C. 67, 116 F.2d 552, imposed on appellee the affirmative duty of proving that the car was not at the time of the accident operated with his express or implied consent. Rosenberg…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Rosenberg v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Hiscox v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. IngallsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API