Legal Opinion
Independent School District No. 697 v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 29, 1994No. C2-92-1625PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
In this breach of insurance contract action, petitioner, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. (“St. Paul”), asks us to review whether the court of appeals correctly concluded that under a school administration liability policy issued to respondent, School District No. 697, Eveleth, Minnesota (“the district”), (1) St. Paul had a duty to defend and pay settlement costs incurred in an intentional age discrimination claim brought against the district, and (2) St. Paul had a duty to defend a reinstatement claim brought against the district which did not seek money…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chicago Title Insurance Company, a Missouri Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.