Kronck v. Reid
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Charles Circuit Court. — Horn. E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) Appellant’s so-called “statement, points and argument” filed in this cause is no compliance with these rules, and the cause should be dismissed for this reason. Rule 19 of rules of ,practice; MeCullom v. Ulen, 87 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Charles Circuit Court. — Horn. E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) Appellant’s so-called “statement, points and argument” filed in this cause is no compliance with these rules, and the cause should be dismissed for this reason. Rule 19 of rules of ,practice; MeCullom v. Ulen, 87 Mo. App. 606; R. S. 1899, sec. 863. (2) If the appeal is not dismissed for the reason assigned above, the judgment should be affirmed because the appellant failed to comply with the requirements of sections 812 and 813, Revised Statutes of 1899. The bill of exceptions was filed in this cause September 9,1901. It…
1Opinion of the CourtReyburn, J.
The record in this case is made up of about one hundred and fifty typewritten pages, and the appellant exhibits in his brief what he terms his “statement, points and argument,” occupying two full and two fractional pages of printed matter. This tract *432fails to comply with the rules of practice prevailing in this court, and section 863 of the present statutes, in every particular and requirement: it does not contain any statement of the pleadings or facts shown by the record, no enumeration of the points or legal propositions made or relied upon, nor is any assignment of the errors alleged to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Home Savings Bank v. OtterbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Jonesboro v. United Iron Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Erwin v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Broyles Ex Rel. Broyles v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928