Commonwealth v. Brown
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
Defendant seeks to vacate his sentence and to file post-verdict motions nunc pro tunc. He argues that he did not voluntarily and knowingly waive his right to file post-verdict motions. We agree.
On February 12, 1979, a jury found the defendant guilty of theft and not guilty of burglary. On this same day the trial judge conducted a post-verdict colloquy as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(c). In accordance with Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(c) the trial judge informed the defendant of his right to file post-verdict motions and of the right to the assistance of counsel in filing such motions;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SchrothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BlumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. RinierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.