Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1967No. Appeals, 94 and 95PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

In this appeal appellant-defendant, Sharon Blum, raises constitutional questions concerning a search made of her person and the propriety of her sentence to the State Industrial Home for Women at Muncy, Pennsylvania. She also questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain her conviction on two bills of indictment charging her, inter alia, with armed robbery. The Commonwealth-appellee contends that she is not privileged to raise the issues of the search and the sufficiency of the evidence inasmuch as she failed to file post-conviction motions prior to the time…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. Mayloy & KeatingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Commonwealth v. GrilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Newsome v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. WhitingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. United States ex rel. Boyd v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. United States Ex Rel. Mandrier v. HewittDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API