Legal Opinion
Berel Co. v. Sencit F/G McKinley Associates
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 24, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 86-3285PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COHEN, Senior District Judge:
On January 25, 1989, Judge Jerome B. Simandle, United States Magistrate, granted plaintiff, Berel Company, (“Berel”) leave to amend its complaint to include a counterclaim against third party defendant, Sullivan Arfaa, P.C. (“Sullivan”) on grounds of negligence, misrepresentation and breach of contract. Subsequently, on February 1, 1989, Sullivan answered Berel’s counterclaim, and moved to appeal Judge Simandle’s Opinion and Order before us filed on February 6,1989. The lengthy factual and procedural background has been set forth in detail in Judge Simandle’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Third-Party v. George A. Fuller Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Evra Corp. v. Swiss Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. San Clemente Financial Group Securities, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Toth v. Alice Pearl, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Boody v. Township of Cherry HillDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Berel Co. v. Sencit F/G McKinley AssociatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989