Legal Opinion

H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Williams

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 29, 1988No. 04-88-00132-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESQUIVEL, Justice.

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus conditionally granted.

H.E. Butt Grocery Company (hereinafter referred to as “H.E.B.”) filed its petition for writ of mandamus in this Court, seeking relief from an order of the trial court granting plaintiff and real party in interest Victoria Vasquez’s motion to compel and denying H.E.B.’s motion for protective order, thereby requiring H.E.B. to produce “any reports, memoranda, or witness statements generated before the date suit was filed.” The documents in question were developed in connection with the investigation of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stringer v. Eleventh Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Robinson v. Harkins & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Turbodyne Corp. v. HeardTexas Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dallas Fire Insurance Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Powers v. Palacios, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. American Home Assurance Co. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  4. American Home Assurance Co. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  5. In Re CPS Energy v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API