Williams v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ATKINS, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the defendants’ Rule 41(b) motion for involuntary dismissal upon the close of all the evidence, including testimony and exhibits, received in plaintiff’s case in chief. The Court is of the opinion that all the evidence bearing on the relevant issues of law have been submitted in the plaintiff’s case in chief, and thus no further evidence need be adduced.
APPLICABLE LAW
1. In holding that parties to a labor dispute may lawfully agree to deprive a party of “any rights under the Railway Labor Act or any…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
- Yarnall v. Yorkshire Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1981
- United States v. State of Tex.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1981
- The United States v. Lockheed Petroleum Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1529 v. Delta Catfish Processors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1991
- Williams v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.