Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 2008No. WD 67827PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.

After municipal and state authorities convicted Mark L. Clark of driving violations that grew out of the same incident, Clark contends in this appeal that the state convictions violated his constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy. The circuit court’s judgment convicted him on State charges of driving while intoxicated, resisting a lawful detention or stop, and operating a motor vehicle in a careless and imprudent manner. Clark also complains that the circuit court wrongfully denied his motion for a continuance. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. BordenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. State v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Copeland v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. DawsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. KamakaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. REANDOMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API