Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Locke
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2010No. 09-2485PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Norman Steibel appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants on his claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Chief Edward Locke used excessive force to effectuate his unlawful arrest and that the City of Bella Villa was deliberately indifferent to his constitutional rights. 1 Under the facts viewed in a light most favorable to Steibel, Chief Locke is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on some of Steibel’s claims. Therefore, we reverse in part and affirm in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Steibel based his claim on the following…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Chambers v. PennycookCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Mark Atkinson v. City of Mountain ViewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Clint Small v. James McCrystalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Brook Bernini v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Ash-har Quraishi v. Deputy Michael AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.