Semrau v. Herrick
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The defendant, Julie A. Herrick, appeals from the trial court’s judgment ordering a new trial in the negligence action filed by the plaintiff, John Semrau. The court ordered an additur to the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff following a hearing in damages. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly granted the additur on the basis of an improper conclusion that the verdict was inadequate as a matter of law. Because we conclude that the defendant, having accepted the additur, lacks standing to challenge that order, we dismiss the appeal.
The following facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Civiello v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Francis X. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co, Inc. And Penn Trans Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Stern v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Cohen v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elliott v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Baudanza v. Comcast of Massachusetts I, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009