Legal Opinion

Semrau v. Herrick

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 17, 2002No. AC 21709PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The defendant, Julie A. Herrick, appeals from the trial court’s judgment ordering a new trial in the negligence action filed by the plaintiff, John Semrau. The court ordered an additur to the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff following a hearing in damages. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly granted the additur on the basis of an improper conclusion that the verdict was inadequate as a matter of law. Because we conclude that the defendant, having accepted the additur, lacks standing to challenge that order, we dismiss the appeal.

The following facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Civiello v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Francis X. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co, Inc. And Penn Trans Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Stern v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Cohen v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Baudanza v. Comcast of Massachusetts I, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API