Legal Opinion

LEON-OROSCO AND RODRIGUEZ-COLAS

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1984No. ID 2974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2974 MATTER OF LEON OROSCO AND RODRIGUEZ COLAS - - In Exclusion Proceedings A-23215742 A-24790678 • Decided by Board November 30, 1983 Decided by Attorney General July 27, 1984 (1) A motion to reopen exclusion proceedings for the purpose of applying for asylum and withholding of deportation will not be granted where a prima facie case of eligibility for such relief has not been established, the alien has not reasonably explained his failure to assert his asylum claim prior to completion of his exclu- sion hearing, or the immigration judge is not satisfied that the evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Leconte Fleurinor v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Ramin Rejaie v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. John M. Brown v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Hamm's Drive Inn, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. COELHOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
  2. HAIMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. GARCIA-GARROCHOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1986
  4. R-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
  5. RUIZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API