Legal Opinion

HAIM

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1988No. ID 3060PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

interim Decision #3060 MATTER OF HAIM In Exclusion Proceedings A-28593629 Decided by Board April 11, 1988 (1) Where an immigration judge conducts an exclusion or deportation hearing in ab- sentia, an alien can move to have the immigration judge reopen the proceedings when the cause of the alien's failure to appear relates to facts not before the im- migration judge at the time of his decision. (2) When t1 he :is for a motion to reopen is that the immigration judge held an in absentia hearing, the alien must establish that he had "reasonable cause" for his absence from the proceedings. (3) A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bhima Nathubhai Patel v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. NAFIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
  3. PATELBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
  4. MARALLAGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1971
  5. LEON-OROSCO AND RODRIGUEZ-COLASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Alejandro Margalli-Olvera v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Ramirez-Alejandre v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
  4. Ricardo Hernandez-Vivas v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. R-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API