Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Ashland, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 9, 2011No. Civil No. 09-3515(DSD/FLN)Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1115ORDER

DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the motion for summary judgment by defendant Ashland, Inc. d/b/a Valvoline Instant Oil Change (Valvoline). Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court grants the motion.

BACKGROUND

This employment dispute arises out of the termination of plaintiff Brandon Lewis by Valvoline on December 1, 2008. Lewis began working for Valvoline as a technician in May 2008. Valvoline has a substance abuse policy stating that “[ejmployees who ... refuse to cooperate fully with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API