Legal Opinion

Andre v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1991No. E008853PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DABNEY, Acting P. J.

Following an unsuccessful settlement conference, the trial court transferred this action from the superior court to the municipal court under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 396. The basis for the order was the trial court’s finding that plaintiff was “unlikely” to recover damages in excess of $25,000, and that the matter was therefore within the exclusive jurisdiction of the municipal court. (§ 86.)

Plaintiff filed a petition for writ of mandate with this court, which we summarily denied. The Supreme Court granted review, and subsequently…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Soto v. Royal Globe InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Campbell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stern v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Kent v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Kayle v. RemeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Yousafzai v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Chahal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API