Legal Opinion
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1966No. 23659PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Chief Judge:
The appellant-Brotherhood and the Florida East Coast Railroad (hereinafter, “FEC”) have been involved in a prolonged labor controversy, more fully described by this court at 336 F.2d 172 (see also 348 F.2d 682), centering around the company’s attempt, in 1963, to institute certain changes in the collective bargaining agreement. While this court held that changes reasonably necessary to enable FEC to continue to operate could be made, the railroad, at the same time, was prohibited from effectuating other deviations until the proper statutory procedures had been exhausted,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's CafeSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and H. E. Gilbert v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Nehemiah Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Central Vermont Railway, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.