Legal Opinion
Bottomly v. Parmenter
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 2, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
The material allegations contained in the first count are as follows:
About two years before her death, the testatrix, Eva B. Parmenter, purchased a farm in Salem for the plaintiffs, taking from them a note for $11,000 (the amount of the purchase price) secured by a mortgage on the property. The parties then entered into a contract whereby the plaintiffs agreed to support and care for the testatrix for the remainder of her life, and she in turn promised to hold the note and mortgage “only so long as she might .. . desire to live upon said premises.” The testatrix died March 5, 1928, having…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marsh v. . MastertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Clifton v. MeuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Thayer v. HarbicanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Laird v. Laird's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Ware v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lougee v. BeresSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Dudley v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Bassis v. RutenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Abramson v. GradyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Peerless Corp. v. ChinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.