Legal Opinion

Meado-Lawn Homes, Inc. v. Westchester Lighting Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

Prior to February 24, 1937, the defendant Development Corporation was the owner of a tract of land in Westchester County which it was developing for subdivision and sale. To further such purposes it entered into agreements with the defendant Lighting Company whereby the latter laid and maintains its gas mains in certain streets through or abutting on the tract. The Development Corporation, pursuant to the provisions of such agreements, paid the Lighting Company substantial sums based on the *670size and length of gas mains laid, and it also, at its own cost and expense, excavated the trenches…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. East Asiatic Co. v. CorashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. 165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Meado-Lawn Homes, Inc. v. Westchester Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. 165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API