Legal Opinion

Foster v. Rosamond

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1937No. 6 Div. 51PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Appellant, who was the plaintiff in the court below, began this suit against appellee claiming $2,500 of him because of the alleged breach of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant (appellee) whereby the defendant agreed to invest $3,000 for the plaintiff in Florida real estate — the “Florida boom” being in full swing at the time- — with the further understanding that the defendant guaranteed that the money would be returned within a certain number of months; that the defendant should undertake such service and assume such risk without any compensation whatsoever ;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Ohme v. BisimanisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Layman v. Minneapolis Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Stephens v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Forest Investment Corp. v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Lassetter v. KingAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Birmingham Electric Co. v. TonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Killian v. WebberAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API