Ohme v. Bisimanis
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOÜLDIN, J.
The action was for alleged personal injury to plaintiff, a pedestrian, charged to the negligence of defendants in striking him with an automobile at the intersection of Adams and Court streets in the city of Montgomery.
The injury complained of was a double hernia resulting from such collision. There was verdict for plaintiff.
Defendants moved for a new trial. Ground No. 3 of said motion reads:
“On account of newly discovered evidence, material to the defendants, which defendants could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced on the trial.”
The alleged injury was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. ScrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Camp v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Brown v. Standard Casket Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Avco Corporation v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. TonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.