Legal Opinion

Locascio v. Fluor Corporation

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 18, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00154Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DEBORAH LOCASCIO, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-0154-X § FLUOR CORPORATION, et al., § § Defendants. § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are two motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 40; Doc. No. 41]. For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS the motions. Summers will have twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in this order. I. Factual Background Sometimes stocks underperform.1 This is a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API