Locascio v. Fluor Corporation
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DEBORAH LOCASCIO, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-0154-X § FLUOR CORPORATION, et al., § § Defendants. § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are two motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 40; Doc. No. 41]. For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS the motions. Summers will have twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in this order. I. Factual Background Sometimes stocks underperform.1 This is a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.