Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. Ford

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 10, 1950No. Civ. No. 7908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment made by the plaintiffs in a suit which seeks recovery against a guardian and his surety for the guardian’s alleged defalcations. The guardianship arose under the laws of the State of Maine, and a Maine probate court has found that the guardian owes and has not paid certain moneys to his wards, the plaintiffs. This motion asks recovery only against the surety, both on his bond and in excess of it on the theory that by exercising joint control of the funds in the hands of the guardian the surety became a joint tort-feasor and guardian…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Biggins v. Oltmer Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  3. Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Andrews v. Tuttle-Smith Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Insurance Company Of New York v. O. Henry Tent & Awning CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Commonwealth Insurance v. O. Henry Tent & Awning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API