McKenzie v. City of Berlin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The plaintiffs, twenty-nine employees of defendant City of Berlin (City), challenge part of the injunctive relief granted by the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.). The City cross-appealed the court’s grant of declaratory judgment and injunctive relief but at oral argument indicated that it had already implemented the court-ordered relief, making this portion of its cross-appeal moot. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The parties dispute the plaintiffs’ entitlement to State retirement benefits. The plaintiffs, members of Local 1444 of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Dumont v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. Belknap CountySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Appeal of Estate of Van LunenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Clapp v. Goffstown School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Winnacunnet Cooperative School District v. Town of SeabrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- JTR Colebrook, Inc. v. Town of ColebrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In re Goffstown Education Support StaffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.