Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

*1405BROUSSARD, J.

I dissent. I adopt part III of the well-reasoned opinion of the Court of Appeal (prepared by Justice Work and concurred in by Acting Presiding Justice Staniforth and Justice Wiener) as my own opinion, with a few alterations.1

Dyna-Med, [Inc. (Dyna-Med),] supported by amic[i] Merchants and Manufacturers Association (MMA) [and others],2 set forth multiple challenges to the [Fair Employment and Housing] Commission’s [(Commission)] authority to award punitive damages. In essence, they contend [the Fair Employment and Housing Act’s QFEHA [or act)] language and legislative history…