Legal Opinion

Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 4, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

These cases arise out of the same circumstances of fact. The starting point for the fact sequences consists of the existence of a corporation known as The Standard Stoker Company which William C. Peyton, the father of the complainant, had organized in his lifetime to carry on a business that became under the guidance of himself and his associates eminently successful and, I gather, highly profitable, and concerning the future of *192which after his death he was, as is quite evident from his will, very much concerned.

Control of the Stoker Company was vested in PeytonduPont…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. Manning v. PippenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Curry v. CottonIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Abercrombie v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  3. Greenly v. GreenlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  4. Aldridge v. Franco Wyoming Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
  5. Ringling v. Ringling Bros.—Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API