Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
These cases arise out of the same circumstances of fact. The starting point for the fact sequences consists of the existence of a corporation known as The Standard Stoker Company which William C. Peyton, the father of the complainant, had organized in his lifetime to carry on a business that became under the guidance of himself and his associates eminently successful and, I gather, highly profitable, and concerning the future of *192which after his death he was, as is quite evident from his will, very much concerned.
Control of the Stoker Company was vested in PeytonduPont…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Manning v. PippenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Curry v. CottonIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Abercrombie v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
- Greenly v. GreenlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- Aldridge v. Franco Wyoming Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
- Ringling v. Ringling Bros.—Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.