Legal Opinion
People v. Carroll
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1936No. Docket No. 130, Calendar No. 38,421PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.
Respondent was informed against for violation of Act No. 235, § 15, Pub. Acts 1933; and was charged with being a partner in the operation of a dental parlor contrary to the above statute. He was tried and convicted. The record shows that respondent is not a licensed dentist, but has for more than 20 years been operating a dental parlor in Michigan under the name “New System Dentists” where all dental work was done by regularly licensed dentists; and at the time of the acts complained of he had three licensed dentists in his employ.
In his appeal respondent contends:
“1. That the act is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Attorney General Ex Rel. Eaves v. State Bridge CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Beacon Club v. Kalamazoo County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Benson v. State Hospital CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Michigan Boiler & Sheet Iron Works Ex Rel. American Mutual Liability Co. v. DresslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.