Matinzi v. Joy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Silverman and Fein, JJ.,
dissent in a memorandum by Fein, J., as follows: The majority pays homage to the finality of administrative decisions, based upon the proposition that the passage of time has rendered it too late for *782petitioner to obtain a rehearing as to the 1979 decontrol of his apartment. But the very nature of fraud is such as to conceal facts which would otherwise have been brought out in a timely manner. The rent commissioner has recognized as much in independently requesting remand to give him an opportunity to explore the allegations of fraud. This would not be a remand merely…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Finnegan v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Vranick v. VranickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Yasser v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Yasser v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.