Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matinzi v. Joy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 4, 1983Published

1Dissent

Silverman and Fein, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Fein, J., as follows: The majority pays homage to the finality of administrative decisions, based upon the proposition that the passage of time has rendered it too late for *782petitioner to obtain a rehearing as to the 1979 decontrol of his apartment. But the very nature of fraud is such as to conceal facts which would otherwise have been brought out in a timely manner. The rent commissioner has recognized as much in independently requesting remand to give him an opportunity to explore the allegations of fraud. This would not be a remand merely…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Finnegan v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Vranick v. VranickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Yasser v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Yasser v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API