Legal Opinion
Petition of Minnesota Power
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 1996No. C5-95-1813PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Minnesota Power and Light Company (Minnesota Power) filed an application with respondent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC), proposing a general increase in electric rates. The MPUC suspended the proposed rates and ordered interim rates. Following contested case proceedings, the MPUC determined new rates and set an effective date for the new rates and rate schedules. Relators challenge the delayed effective date for the new rates and rate schedules. We affirm.
FACTS
Minnesota Power is an investor-owned company that provides retail electric service to eight…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Backus-Brooks Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Brown v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Excelsior Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Medical License of FriedensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable Energy Objectives Under Minn. Stat. 216B.1691Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005