Legal Opinion

Humboldt Land & Cattle Co. v. Sixth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1924No. 2622PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*403By the Court,

Sanders, J.:

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. The proceeding involves purely legal questions, and a statement of the undisputed facts may be omitted.

The petitioners insist that the procedure adopted in section 35 of the water law (chapter 140, Statutes of 1913; chapter 253, Statutes of 1915; chapter 106, Statutes of 1921) for the final hearing and adjudication of the order of determination of the state engineer, which defines the relative rights of the various claimants and appropriators to the waters of a stream or stream-system, in this instance the waters of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. In Re Waters of Chewaucan RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Vineyard Land & Stock Co. v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ElkoNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Bergman v. KearneyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nevada Industrial Commission v. ReeseNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Water RightsNevada Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Willow River Water Users Ass'n v. Orchards Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. United States v. Humboldt Lovelock Irr. Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Carpenter v. Sixth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of HumboldtNevada Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API