Veith v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright
¶ 1 This case requires us to determine what constitutes “consent” by a defendant in the context of probation. 1 Specifically, we must decide if a defendant consented to the probationary portion of his sentence when he requested probation in lieu of incarceration, but instead received a ten-year prison sentence in addition to the probationary sentence he requested.
¶ 2 Petitioner Austin Slattery Veith pleaded guilty to theft and securities fraud. He asked the trial court to sentence him to probation instead of a term of incarceration. The trial court rejected his request for probation with no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Delgado v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Holdren v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- People v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- v. DominguezColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Audrey Lee Tennyson v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.