Legal Opinion

Veith v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 6, 2017No. Supreme Court Case 14SC1021PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright

¶ 1 This case requires us to determine what constitutes “consent” by a defendant in the context of probation. 1 Specifically, we must decide if a defendant consented to the probationary portion of his sentence when he requested probation in lieu of incarceration, but instead received a ten-year prison sentence in addition to the probationary sentence he requested.

¶ 2 Petitioner Austin Slattery Veith pleaded guilty to theft and securities fraud. He asked the trial court to sentence him to probation instead of a term of incarceration. The trial court rejected his request for probation with no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Delgado v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Holdren v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. People v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  2. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  3. People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. v. DominguezColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Audrey Lee Tennyson v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API