Legal Opinion

Bouillion v. Eli Lilly & Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 13, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-3437-OPublished

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, District Judge.

This matter is now before us on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant, Eli Lilly & Company (“Eli Lilly”).

This prescription drug product liability action was originally brought by plaintiffs in state court in October 1986. Shortly thereafter, defendant removed the action to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441.

In their Complaint, plaintiffs allege that they have sustained injuries as a result of plaintiff Mary Rose Picard’s ingestion of the drug, synthetic estrogen diethylstilbes-trol (“DES”). Plaintiffs claim that Mrs. Picard took DES…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API