Legal Opinion
Mayor of Baltimore v. Deegan
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 5, 1932No. [No. 60, April Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
The question in this case is whether Chapter 37 of the Acts of 1931 relating to the disposition of fines and forfeitures repealed section 4-38 of the City Charter.
The suit was by the city to recover from the sheriff of Baltimore City all the fines, penalties, and forfeitures accruing in the criminal courts of said city, collected by him during the month of February, 1932. It appears from an agreed statement of facts that the sheriff recovered during said month the sum of $1,375.35, of which sum 35 cents was fines for violation of city ordinances, leaving a balance of $1,375. The contention of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alexander v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Painter v. MattfeldtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Dashiell v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Heald v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Swan v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thomas v. Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Baltimore Retail Liquor Package Stores Ass'n v. Board of License CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Shub v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- A. H. Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Wimpling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.