Legal Opinion

Heald v. District of Columbia

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 8, 1920No. 300PublishedCited by 23 opinions

CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the, opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

The certificate made by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia as the basis for the questions which are propounded shows that, they relate to a pending suit to recover taxes, assessed by the District of Columbia upon intangible property, pursuant to an act of Congress, and paid under protest on the ground that the assessment was “illegal and void in whole and in its several parts.” It suffices to say that the questions, which are stated in the margin, 1 express the purpose of the court below to ask our instructions as to the constitutionality of the act of Congress in the light of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Parsons v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Anderson v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Field v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Heald v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Key v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. F. G. Bonfils TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API