State v. Redmond
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
*580 Morquel Redmond appeals his conviction of robbery with a dangerous weapon. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of common law robbery. Because the trial court could have found the box cutter to be a dangerous weapon as a matter of law, despite submitting this issue to the jury, Defendant was not entitled to a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of common law robbery. Defendant's trial was free of prejudicial error.
I. Background
The State's evidence tended to show that on 20 March 2015, Defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. LeazerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- State v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021