Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norris v. McFadden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1909No. Docket No. 36Published

Error to Kent; Sessions, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Mark Norris, trustee, and another against Austin McPadden for rent. A judgment for plaintiffs on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1DissentGrant, J.

Mark Norris, one of the plaintiffs, as trustee under the will of Charles Shepard, deceased, and as executor and trustee under the will of Dorinda N. Shepard, deceased, and the other plaintiff, executed to defendant, on September 6, 1904, a lease of the Auditorium, so-called, in the city of Grand Rapids, for the term of one year from and after October 1, 1904, with the privilege of renewing the same from year to year for the further period of four years; the lessee to give the lessor written notice of such renewal on or before the 1st day of May in each year.

The Auditorium was a public hall,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. . HarteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Bowe v. HunkingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Call v. HaunTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Moore v. WeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API