Legal Opinion
Davis v. Mitchell
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 14, 2024No. 1:19-cv-03212Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DEON DAVIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-CV-3212 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland DR. JAQUELINE MITCHELL and DR. RICHARD ORENSTEIN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Deon Davis sues two dentists working at Stateville Correctional Center in 2019 under the Eighth Amendment, alleging that they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. [44]. Defendants Mitchell and Orenstein move now for summary judgment. [116]; [119]. For the reasons explained below, this Court grants Defendants’ motions. SUMMARY…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.