Legal Opinion

Coburn v. Cedar Valley Land & Cattle Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Motion to dissolve preliminary injunction, which had been granted without notice. The facts are sufficiently stated in tho opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormick, J.

The bill in this case w7as addressed to tho state district court for Oldham county. It shows, in substance, that the complainants are citizens of Missouri and the respondents aliens, the respondent corporation being organized under the laws of Great Britain, and having its principal office in London, and the other respondent being a resident of London and subject of Great Britain; that the respondent company is the owner of a large ranch (75,000 acres or more) in the north-western part of the state (Pan Handle) and of large herds of cattle thereon, numbering many thousand (numbers given) and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shubert v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Hamilton v. FowlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1897
  3. Preston v. McNeil Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API