Legal Opinion

Seeley Ex Rel. Seeley v. Sobczak

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1979No. 48937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN L. MAXWELL, Justice.*

Plaintiffs claim that defendants sold intoxicating liquor to plaintiffs’ decedent when he was obviously intoxicated, in violation of the Civil Damage Act. The jury returned a verdict for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal, asking this court to hold that the decedent, whose blood alcohol content at the time of death was .269, was obviously intoxicated as a matter of law. We affirm.

Plaintiffs are the wife and three minor children of decedent, Douglas Seeley. Defendants are the Eagle Tavern, its owners and operators, and its insurer.

Douglas Seeley arrived at the Eagle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strand v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Fitzer v. BloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Mjos Ex Rel. Mjos v. Village of Howard LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Ruskamp v. FerknesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. C.O. v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Coughlin v. RadosevichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Coughlin v. RadosevichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Larson v. Moorhead Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Seeley Ex Rel. Seeley v. SobczakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API