Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Duke Capital
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 23, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00229Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH SARAH CASTILLO, VIKTORIA MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER SVENSSON, and ROBIN BEAN, ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT v. Case No. 20-cv-00229-JNP DUKE CAPITAL, LLC, District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendant. Sarah Castillo, Viktoria Svensson, and Robin Bean (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allege that Duke Capital, LLC (“Duke Capital”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act. Before the court is Defendant Duke Capital’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wilkerson v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Turner v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.